# nfrs.sgit.ai — brief pack

**For:** the agent commissioned to build `nfrs.sgit.ai`
**From:** Dinis Cruz, via the SG/Send Librarian
**Version:** v0.33.62 · 24 August 2026
**Licence:** CC BY 4.0 — see `LICENSE.md`

---

## What this is

The home for the non-functional-requirements topics — CI, testing, security, scalability, resilience, explainability, serverless, architecture, documentation, budgets, project management — built as **the network's hub**: it owns the disciplines that have no other home, and the topic map that shows an agent where everything else lives.

**The name is right.** `nfrs.sgit.ai` is the corpus's own operative term — the villagers brief defines it verbatim: *"the whole version control, reliability, resilience, security, backups, consistency, explainability, and documentation."* That sentence is the site's table of contents. Expand the acronym in sentence one; otherwise ship it.

**And the commissioning message contains the network's purpose statement:**

> *"these sites are a more evolved and focused version of what is usually called LLM memory."*

`02__` develops that into a page — memory you can **read, cite, version, license and hand to any agent, because it is a website** — and recommends it for the `sgit.ai` hub too.

---

## Read in this order

| File | Words | What it does |
|---|---:|---|
| **`00__BRIEF.md`** | 1.1k | **Start here.** The naming verdict, the hub shape, the owns/links split, the scorecard |
| **`01__the-topic-map.md`** | 0.8k | The hub's core artefact — every NFR topic: position in one line, canonical source, owner site |
| **`02__the-memory-thesis.md`** | 0.7k | The sites-as-agent-memory page, with the evidence it was already the design (`for_llms` filenames, the markdown twin, the agent-access report) |
| `03__the-owned-disciplines.md` | 0.8k | Testing, CI, documentation/reality, budgets, PM — position, verbatim material, counter-evidence |
| `04__site-architecture.md` | 0.3k | Page by page; the generate-or-date rule |
| `05__boundaries-and-licensing.md` | 0.3k | The hub's contract: owns vs links-and-never-restates |
| `06__gaps-and-open-questions.md` | 0.7k | 6 build-fresh items, 5 open questions, 4 tensions |
| `09__source-manifest.csv` | 23 rows | Every source, tiered 0–3, **every path verified on disk** |

---

## The four things worth your attention

**1. The scorecard is the credibility move.** The estate measured against its own eight-NFR list: version control ✅, resilience ✅-with-a-dead-workflow, security ✅-with-one-disclosed-incident, **backups ⚠️ no doctrine at all**, consistency 🟡, explainability ✅-with-no-evals, documentation ✅-with-a-fictional-README. Every lapse is already published in a sibling pack — this site adds assembly, not exposure. A clean column would be dishonest; the mixed table is the teaching.

**2. IFD is the most original owned asset.** Iterative Flow Development — the estate's named methodology, versioned guides at `v1.2.x`, written explicitly *"for LLMs assisting with IFD-based development… preserving developer flow state."* **Nobody outside the estate has ever seen it.** Publishing it is also a test of the open-source position (*"the moat is a rate, not a wall"*) — `06__` Q3 says decide that explicitly rather than assume it.

**3. The most original PM page is a description of what already happens.** "How a brief becomes work here" — acceptance criteria, same-day cross-team reviews, day-indexes, numbered asks, good-failure/bad-failure debriefs, ~4,000 documents of demonstrated practice, described nowhere as a system. It doubles as onboarding for every new agent session, which is the memory thesis in action.

**4. Backups is the honest gap.** The eighth item on the corpus's own list, 151 mentions, no doctrine — in the estate with irreversible publishing and frozen vaults. `06__` Q5 asks the right first question: is the vault model (versioning + escrow) already the doctrine, unnamed? An hour of thinking, then either the page or the dated stub.

---

## The hub's one rule

**Link the measurement, never restate it; generate or date every number.** This site quotes more sibling measurements than any other — it has the most to lose from drift, and the memory thesis raises the stakes: a stale page in an agent-memory network is a false memory.

---

This file is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).
